They heard all the documentary, film, and oral testimony about the crimes of twenty-two men chosen for their prominence, breadth of experience in contrastive aspects of the Nazi regime, and direct participation in war crimes. Prosecutors from each(prenominal) of the countries gathered documents, interrogated witnesses and defendants, and to a lower placetook cross-examination at the appropriate time (Stiles 183).
Stiles concludes that the defendants in the main received fair treatment and ultimately justice (Stiles 186). He also finds that the trials were a good example of international up truth exemplifying a general body of values and principles, a set of codified treaties, and a feature of domestic law. He also notes a problem, the problem of applying law which is not merely codified in treaty form:
German defendants and after critics have argued that the law applied at Nuremburg was ex stakes facto, especially insofar as crimes against peace and humanity be concerned. . . [and] apt(p) the heritage of colonialism
Dole, Bob. "let Bosnia Control Its Own Future." Newsweek (August 7, 1995), 41.
Though the UN system and the Nuremburg Principles may be imperfect in their application and their effect, they are still the better(p) instruments we have to bring war criminals to justice and to do so in a fair manner.
Clinton, Bill. "The Risk of 'Americanizing' the War." Newsweek (August 7, 1995), 40.
The war in Bosnia has produced massive evidence of acts against civilians that would constitute war crimes, much of it under the heading of "ethnic cleansing," a polite term for genocide.
The give way has also brought about international efforts to try those suspected of war crimes, and the UN tribunal investigating such crimes in the Balkans has charged Zeljko Meakic, the Serbian commander of a concentration camp in Bosnia, with genocide. xx other Serbian commanders, guards, and visitors at the camp were also charged with war crimes (Cohen A1).
The fact that the international community has been adequate to scoff on certain individuals as war criminals is significant given the fact that different countries of the world have not been able to agree on the nature of the conflict or the rightness of the different sides. Paris and London tend to see a moral equivalence for all sides, and this accounts for their peace plans that sacrifice lividness for expediency. The United States look to the origins of the war and see the serbs as aggressors and the Muslims as victims (Post 25). A recent CIA study concluded that the Serbs were responsible for at least 90 percent of the ethnic cleansing atrocities. The authoritative European claim is that the struggle is a civil war for which the Serbs, Croats, and Muslims are all to blame (Watson 41). However, the United Nations has concluded that a number of Serbs have committed atrocities that rise to the level of war crimes and that these people should be brought to justice in the international are
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment