'Should women be allowed to serve in combat positions in the US military?'

'\n\nWomen played an chief(prenominal) position in army and army conflicts so far centuries ago. treat and providing help at soldiers hospitals, they were an infallible part of the concealed front which gave the premier(prenominal) aid and deport to injured soldiers. In the modern world, women acquired even greater role in the troops sphere delinquent to the impact of womens liberation movement and equality.\n\nAt the contri scarcee moment, females in the US be allowed to divine usefulness in attack positions despite numerous concerns. Western high society got used to thought process that women are light from nature and, impertinent men, were not intentional to defend and storm with the assailants. Moreover, there live on moral and mental obstacles for women to avoid soldiery good because of the roughshod and improper way of male soldiers. just now with the pass of snip our perception of truthfulness transforms and it happened to the image of women in military service as well.\n\nIt would be fair to severalise that females should befuddle a right to plight part in combat when they are physically and mentally ready to do it. Military service is their voluntary decision, so why should they be banned from it? As soon as women have substantiate their power and powerfulness to combat they shall be accepted into service. Surely, they willing be jilted if they did not make out well in trials or have health issues, but some of them are ready and get going to take positions in the front. As the sex bias has no room in the modern community, military service shall be open to the persons who act as the requirement disregardless of their gender.'