Writing tips and writing guidelines for students,case study samples, admission essay examples, book reviews, paper writing tips, college essays, research proposal samples
Wednesday, 9 January 2019
Hcs 571
chief city Project HCS/571 Capital as adjusts atomic number 18 gener on the wholey barter ford to modify fictitious char act aser of c atomic number 18fulness, or to provide packed equipment for a natural service or refinement of an existing service. The key element in hood budgeting is that the building or writing of equipment being acquired has a lifetime that ex decenniumds beyond the year of purchase and it is a capital as machinate or long-term enthronization for the infirmary. Capital assets atomic number 18 good pecuniary investments for the judicature. (Finkler, Ward, & adenosine monophosphate Baker, 2007). The electronic wellness spirit packet administration remains is one of the strategical functional priorities in the US wellness c are.The variety from report card- found videotape dodging to electronic depict carcass projected by technologies and aid for reducing errors and improving calibre of fear base on best practice. (Song, McAle arney, Lausanne, Robbins, & group A McCullough, 2011). Research a capital purchase of software product product for filing affected role drop offs court more than $5000 wellness tutelage compositions suck up invested heavily in computer engineering science. The wellness fear compositions implement computer engineering science and electronic wellness record in the actual amaze iny of compassionate and to detain clinical areas.The four principal ex angstrom unitles of computers for treat are for general selective information, clinical applications, research, and financial solicitude. (Finkler, Ward, & adenylic acid Baker, 2007). The wellness sell placements are in the carry through of major transformation, and becoming more daedal. It is very important to check the safety of longanimous and to provide higher(prenominal) tonus bearing. (Ting, Tsang, Ip, & group Aere Ho, 2011). The electronic wellness record brass is assureed as a means of technolo gical expertness to descend the cost in wellness care arrangement.The regard for EHR in wellness care ecesis is based on certain evidences handle, It supports authorizeline-based care, increase patient remindering, act as an in force(p) technological tool for good communion in areas think to patient care, and improves coordination of care(Song, McAlearney, Lausanne, Robbins, & international angstromere McCullough, 2011). The electronic health record formation act as an easy introduction for checkup literature and it is considered as a strong access transcription overdue to the subsequentlymathive utilization of information applied science and enhances the health care efficiency constitution. Hillestad, 2005). Employee reading The computer software and electronic health record advances testament continue to evolve and that computer utilization by faculty soak ups impart arrest commonplace in most healthcare governments. In the long run this lead s amely increase the quality of patient care due to more complete and timely information, while creating at least(prenominal) some efficiency in the use of nurse time. This should release more nurse time for patient care. (Finkler, Ward, & antiophthalmic factorere Baker, 2007). cybernation should get both to debase nursing shortage and to increase nursing satisf carry out.The health care organizations struggle to allocate capable funds for information system capital punishment, maintenance, and upgrade. The computerization of the nursing units has been a potential resolving for nursing shortage. (Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007). Management goals The EHR capital punishment and g everywherenance are link up to to all(prenominal) other and it is mainly commission on the mission, vision, and behavior think to the way. The decision and action from managers level steering is very native factor for the impressive purchase of EHR. Jarvenpaa & Ives, 1991). The support s ystem in the organization tie in to EHR performance befriends to support and affect the employees in difficult situation connect to the expert failure of the system. (Miller & Sim, 2004). The roaring instruction execution of EMR depends upon the police squad and technology of the organization. squad refers to hatful and issues related with organization. The technology related to the choice of the software, hard ware, and inclination set up of the organization to replete the execution act upon.The main components of execution outgrowth are people, process, and technology. The main focus of the swop management is people and the related documentary is to variegate the behavior for the acceleration of agitate process. (McCarthy & Eastman, 2010). Cost containment The software related electronic health record capital punishment deal to be trance for the take of the organization and budget. (Swab, & Ciotti, 2010) The EHR software system has some areas o f market depending upon the size of it of the hospital seat size.The first criteria for the vendors according to the bed with century and small hospital The electronic health record system cost approximately between $ 1 million and 2 for the electronic health record system The electronic health record software cost for the organization about intermediate hospital cost is much larger than the first one. It comes around three to ten million. The hospital and organization with more than norm bed cost for the electronic health record system entrust be higher amount than the other one.The cost and amount of electronic health record system will depend upon the size of the hospital . The management has to decide about the budget for the organization. (Swab, & Ciotti, 2010). The organization must evaluate its mission and goals in calorie-free of its particular strengths and weakness and in luminance of the demand for ladder and competition in the external environment. Based on that military rank it can make a be later(prenominal) that will take advantage of opportunities homogeneous electronic health record implementation according to the goals of an organization. (Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007).The planning process explicitly address whether the implementation of untried services and programs that make up the mass of operations of the organization are being retained at a steady-state level or whether they are to be contract or expanded in scope. (Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007). The successful implementation of EMR depends upon the team and technology of the organization. group refers to people and issues related with organization. The technology related to the choice of the software, hard ware, and design set up of the organization to meet the implementation process.The main components of implementation process are people, process, and technology. The main focus of the intensify management is people and the related butt is to smorgasbor d the behavior for the acceleration of salmagundi process. (McCarthy & Eastman, 2010). The computerization of the nursing units has been a potential solution for nursing shortage. (Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007). Quality assurance The management of the organization need to review the cost of the software system related to electronic health record implementation with users of the selection commission ahead the system demos.The charge holds staff from clinical areas like pharmacy, radiology, laboratory, operating room, and unavoidableness department. The committee postulate to invite doc champions to participate and observe EHR system demonstrations before selecting the system. (Swab, & Ciotti, 2010). The management of the organization necessarily to clarify the all of the costs such(prenominal) as travel costs, training association tuition fees, files conversion fees, and other assistant system fees with the vendors. A nonher factor need to consider while implemen ting Electronic health record system is the costs of redundant staff required to operate the EHR system.The organization need to consider adding the IT staff, Nurse informaticist, and oldtimer medical examination information officer. (Swab, & Ciotti, 2010). formerly the plan has been finalized and formalized, it serves as a guide for a number of years. Long- range plans are typically prepared only once every three or fiver years. Creating a new plan distributively year would only guide to unvarying varys in the organizations direction. This would lead to wasted efforts, and money. The long-range budgets or strategic plans look in general wrong at the entire organization over a period of years. Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007). curriculum budgeting techniques are equally effective for reviewing the operations of an ongoing unit as for evaluating a new program like Electronic health record implementation. Business plans are becoming essential for the introduction of new programs. Such plans help managers complete a comprehensive examination of a proposed program. By making such a essential review, the manager and the organization gain an in-depth intellectual of the program as well as its financial implications for the organization. Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007). Patient care, clinical research, and leading role The Electronic health record software system support efficient and good health care. Electronic health record improve the completeness and truth of patient records and they improve communication among health care professionals. (Hayrinen,Saranto, &Nykanen, 2008). The larger hospitals, in particular academic medical centers with a high acuity case mix, may get ahead from investing in Electronic health record adoption.The hospitals with high patient volumes and with complex medical problems need to adopt Electronic health record as a capital asset for the organization. (MCcullough, Casey, Moscovice, & Prasad, 2010). Team refer s to people and issues related with organization. The technology related to the choice of the software, hard ware, and design set up of the organization to meet the implementation process. The main components of implementation process are people, process, and technology. The main focus f the change management is people and the related objective is to change the behavior for the acceleration of change process. (McCarthy & Eastman, 2010). The superintending of EHR implementation process mainly focuse on areas like project costs, project progress, schedule take cares, control changes, scope of the project, quality management, and risks. (Noblin, Cortelyou, & Ton, 2011). The EHR implementation is considered as a high-cost project. The management needs to consider and proctor equipment costs including ironware and software costs.The work flow inefficiencies need to monitor and need to redesign during the implementation variant is an important step to overcome the failure. (Spec tor, 2010). The workflow reflects the might of the employee to use the resources to complete the work in an effective manner to attain better results and it also shows the efficiency of team work. (Lee, Cain, Young, Chockley, & Burstin, 2005). The EHR implementation requires strong leadership and all workers need to participate to deliver their own role for the success of the implementation process.The redesigning process improves the work efficiency and melody line happiness. (Spector, 2010). The change from paper medical records to electronic medical record system improve the quality of healthcare, reduce the administrative cost, reduce medical errors, and decrease the unnecessary expenditures for the issues related to medical errors occur during paper charting. (Huryk, 2010). The electronic medical record system is considered as a means of technological efficiency to reduce the cost in healthcare organization.The need for EHR in healthcare organization is based on certain evidences like, It supports guideline-based care, increased patient monitoring, act as an efficient technological tool for effective communication in areas related to patient care, and improves coordination of care(Song, McAlearney, Lausanne, Robbins, & McCullough, 2011). The electronic health record system act as an easy access for medical literature and it is considered as a fast access system due to the effective utilization of information technology and enhances the healthcare efficiency system. Hillestad, 2005). Research studies shows that the paper record system is inadequate to exhibit all informations regarding patient to caregivers for the effective care. (Thakkar & Davis, 2006) The effective use of EHR minimize the problems related to healthcare disparities, allows the involvement of patients and their families in word plan, and maintain adequate privacy and security. (Podgurski, 2008). electronic computer uses for clinical care fall into 2 general areas. The fi rst area is assement of patients.This includes computers utilize in laboratories to measure blood levels, in radiology for magnetic resonance imaging, and for corporeal assessment measures such as blood pressure. The second clinical area is shop and management of patient information. Often called the hospital information system, these computer systems store entropy such as patient demographics, admission, transfer, and paper bag information, and documentation of nursing care provided. (Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007).Although clinical information systems are not directly related to financial management, info produced by these systems can be used to make financial decisions. clinical systems are used to directly link the use of services to the billing for them. Ultimately, financial management is based on the allocation of resources clinical information systems offer the manager information about the use of resources in the organization. Clinical information systems that com bine information from a variety of sources such as laboratory, radiology, dietary, and nursing are called fully integrated systems.In these systems the data are entered once and are hearty all over the organization with appropriate confidentiality precautions. These integrated systems improve the flow of information. (Finkler, Ward, & Baker, 2007). The implementation of EHR in healthcare organization is influenced by human and technological factors. The implementation process depends upon many factors starting from employee attitudes and concerns to different technology.The main factors are readiness for the employee to own the changes related to EHR implementation, resources available for the change, technical concern, accessibility of finance for the implementation of EHR, motivation of the employee, time, and ability of the individual to use computer for the effective implementation of EHR. (McGinn, Grenier, Duplantie, Shaw, Sicotte, Luc, Leduc, Legare, & Gagnon, 2011). The managers need to take interventions to overcome the factors influencing the implementation process aboriginal in the planning stage. (Spector, 2010).The budget development in the initial phase of change process reflects the initial cost and all other related expenses of an electronic health record system. The hardware expense needs to be classified on a yearly basis. The organization need to consider the cost of upgrading the hardware and software system to maintain the efficiency of the system. The cost for the replenishment of hardware and maintenance of the computer need to be considered. The discipline System mastery Model paygrade measures the quality and technical achievement of the system.The system quality depends on the elements like reliability, accessibility, and security of the system. (Delone, & McLean, 2003). The user satisfaction level needs to be evaluated because it reflects the level of competency, skills, and experience of the users. The overall bil ls include quality of care in basis of patient safety, and effectiveness of care, accessibility of care, and productivity. ( Lau, Hagens, &Muttitt, 2007)The implementation process requires skilled people in areas like computer networking, informatics, administration, management, and clinical workflow.The monitoring and controlling of the proper utilization of the resource specialist will help for the cost management. (Wang, 2003). Consultant packages The consultant from outback(a) the organization for any change process need to be assessed, monitored, and controlled as per the organisational policy and management decision. The health care organization may need assist from outside consultants for the effective implementation of EHR and that will cause an extra cost for the implementation process and the management need to monitor the necessity of the consultant for the process. Noblin, Cortelyou, & Ton, 2011). The quality assurance of the Electronic health record software sy stem can be done by the rating process. The paygrade process need to focus on certain elements like care, human, educational, administrative, technical, and affable aspects. (Shaw, 2002). The care aspect of evaluation consists of monitoring the quality of care, continuity, system acceptance from patients and other professionals. The evaluation of organizational aspects mainly focuses on examining the interconnectedness between different care providers in different settings. (Shaw, 2002).The educational aspects of evaluation focus on the quality of the information system for the retention of the staff, training of employees, and user satisfaction related to EHR implementation. The administrative aspect of evaluation addresses the changes related to EHR implementation and the after effect on health care services and mainly focus on areas like access to care, interactions between clients and health care workers, and changes in cost effectiveness related to new electronic system. Th e technical aspects of evaluation measure the technical quality, reliability, and security of the settings.The social aspects of evaluation focus on the changes in the level of social interaction after the implementation of new system. (Shaw, 2002). The other bar strategies include evaluating the output of new system by reviewing employee satisfaction and user satisfaction. The organization need to conduct post go-live reviews after the implementation process to assessment of system. determination The Electronic health record software system is one of the important operational priorities in the US health care and it should be capital assets for the organization.The health care organizations that are decided to purchase an Electronic health record system should forever and a day search for the software system with even out vendors, share the costs with selection committee members, and need to think about the costs of additional staff members required to operate the software syste m. (Swab, & Ciotti, 2010). The other measurement strategies include evaluating the output of new system by reviewing employee satisfaction and user satisfaction. The organization need to conduct post go-live reviews after the implementation process.The successful implementation requires teamwork and effective communication technique between the vendors, health care staff, management, administration, and outside consultants. The health care organization may need attention from outside consultants for the effective implementation of EHR and that will cause an extra cost for the implementation process and the management need to monitor the necessity of the consultant for the process. (Noblin, Cortelyou, & Ton, 2011). References Delone, W. H. , & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success A Ten-Year Update. ledger of Management Information Systems,19(4), 9-30. Hayrinen,K. K. , Saranto, P. , Nykanen, P. (2008). Definition, structure, conten t, use, and impacts of Electronic health records A review of the research literature. supranational Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 291-304 Hillestad, R. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform healthcare? Potential health benefits , savings, and costs. wellness affairs, 2(1), 8-10. Huryk, L. (2010). Factors influencing nurses attitudes towards healthcare information technology. Journal of nursing management, 8(5), 606-612. Jarvenpaa, S. L. , Ives, B. (1991).Executive involvement and participation in the management information technology. Journal of Medical Informatics, 15(2), 205-225. Lau, F. , Hagens, S. , Muttitt, S. (2007). A Proposed Benefits Evaluation Framework for Health Information Systems in Canada. Electronic Healthcare, 10(1), 112-118. Lee, J. , Cain, C. , Young, S. , Chockley, N. , Burstin, H. (2005). The adoption prison-breaking Health information technologyin small doc practices. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1364-1366. McCullough, J. M. , Casey, I. , Moscovice,S. , Prasad,S. (2010). The effect of health information technology on quality in US Hospitals.Health Affairs, 29(4), 647-654. McGinn, C. A. , Grenier, S. , Duplantie, J. , Shaw, N. , Sicotte, C. , Luc, M. , Leduc, Y. , Legare, F. , Gagnon, M. (2011). Comparison of user groups perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records a systematic review. BMC medicine, 9(46), 2-10. Miller, R. H. ,Sim,I. (2004). physicians use of electronic medical records Barriers and solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2),116-126. Noblin, A. M. , Cortelyou, K. W. , & Ton, S. (2011). Electronic Health Record Implementations- Applying the Principles of Monitoring and Controlling to hit Success.The Health Care Manager, 30(1), 45-50. Podgurski, S. A. (2008). Finding a cure The case for regulation and prudence of electronic health record system. Harvard journal of law and technology, 22(1), 107-110. Shaw, N. T. (2002). CHEATS a generic wine information communic ation technology (ICT) evaluation framework. Comput Biol Med, 32(3), 209-220. Song, P. H. , McAlearney, A. S. , Lausanne, E. F. , Robbins, J. , & McCullough, J. S. (2011). Exploring the business case for ambulant electronic health record system adoption. Journal of healthcare management, 56(3), 169-180.Spector, B. (2010). Implementing organizational change Theory into practice (2nd ed. ). Upper lodge River, NJ Prentice Hall. Swab, J. , Ciotti, V. (2010). What to consider when get an EHR system. Health care Financial Management, 64(5), 38-41 Thakkar, M. , & Davis, D. C. (2006). Risks, barriers, and benefits of EHR systems A comparative study based on size of hospital. Research Journal in Health Information Management, 3(5), 10-12. Wang, S. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of Electronic medical records in primary care. American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397-403.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment