Research and Critical Thinking :: Critical Thinking Essays

Research & Critical ThinkingResearch and critical thinking is much(prenominal) a crucial entity in the world of every single attainment and our every day lives. While a biologist is testing the cause of carbon monoxide on the environment, a little girl is pointing in the monger counting how many colors there atomic number 18 in a rainbow. Both of these scenarios involve research and critical thinking except are extremely different. There are no guidelines for the little girl but there are many that the biologist has to follow. The same goes for psychological research. mental research is almost exactly the same as scientific research. startle you must make a hypothesis, experiment, collect selective information, and based off of the data you make conclusions as to whether or not your hypothesis was confirmed. The difference mingled with psychological research and some other sciences is in whats considered data and how that data is gathered and processed. Because psychology deals greatly with the mind and sometimes focuses on things that are not measurable, research has been restricted to things that are observable and therefore can be traced. To do research that successfully gives birth to presumptive data there are certain elements that must be followed as closely as possible. First your hypothesis must be researched and generalized. Secondly, to begin with starting an experiment one must have a low-level variable, a control variable, and an independent variable. Third the data must be collected and translated properly. In the case of the researcher who studied college students he has tout ensemble abused all the elements of research. He has done almost everything wrong in his research, therefore making his research highly un-credible and almost bogus. Starting with the world-class step in the scientific method, which is forming a hypothesis, I have understanding to believe that after reading this researchers hypothesis he hasnt a clue how to properly conduct it. Comparing the four course college students to the twain year college students is not the problem it is the structure of the hypothesis. Instead of saying students at a four year colleges are more intelligent than students at two year colleges, the hypothesis should be if students who bet four year colleges and students who attend two year colleges take the same IQ test, than the students who attend the four year college will score higher than the students who attend the two year college. It is much more descriptive without being to constricting.